Firstly I'm not picking sides as of who really should have won, nor saying it was 100% illegal or anything. I'm just confused why the "aftermath" was deemed legal. Because if this was F1, WTCC or anything, it would be deemed illegal - "not taking the corners properly to gain an advantage" 1996 CART Season, final round at Laguna Seca, CA. Alex Zanardi (red) vs Bryan Herta. On the final lap, Zanardi dives up the inside of Herta at the top part of the Corkscrew (turn 8) to pass, but immediately runs off at the bottom part (turn 8a) in the process. He managed to hold on and take the win. Situation: He didn't cut the top corner - which made the passing part obviously legal, and the pass was complete even before the apex. But he was a tad too fast so he immediately cut the next turn (8a) and "didn't lose ground" as he was supposed to, had he actually tried to amend his mistake and try to make the corner. In short, he DID gain an advantage there by "not losing ground from his mistake". So why was it deemed legal? Please comment! :-)
1996 CART Laguna Seca - The Pass - Why Was It Legal? - YouTube |
| 29 Likes | 29 Dislikes |
| 11,387 views views | 625 followers |
| Sports | Upload TimePublished on 17 Feb 2013 |
the closest one
>
the knot
>
the mule
>
the home depot
>
the society
>
the upside
>
the mandalorian
>
the eternals
>
the boys
>
the hustle
>
thesaurus
>
the farewell
>
the peanut butter falcon
>
the bachelorette
>
the office
>
the weather channel
>
the wizard of oz
>
the lion king
>
the eternals cast
>
the 100
>
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét